Overland Park Officials Evaluate Subsidy for Black & Veatch Development

Article Sponsored by:

CMiC Global

CMIC Global Logo

Since 1974, CMiC has been a global leader in enterprise software for the construction industry. Headquartered in Toronto, Canada, CMiC delivers a fully integrated platform that streamlines project management, financials, and field operations.

With a focus on innovation and customer success, CMiC empowers construction firms to enhance efficiency, improve collaboration, and make data-driven decisions. Trusted by industry leaders worldwide, CMiC continues to shape the future of construction technology.

Read More About CMiC: 

Conceptual image of Overland Park Plaza II's mixed-use development.

News Summary

Overland Park city officials are evaluating a proposed $230 million public subsidy for Black & Veatch’s Overland Park Plaza II project. This plan aims to transform a 78-acre campus into a $1.12 billion mixed-use development, which includes housing, retail, and other amenities. Despite the potential benefits, the subsidy has sparked criticism regarding its impact on local competition and the fairness of using taxpayer funds for a private firm. A public hearing will provide residents with the opportunity to share their views on the proposal.

Overland Park Considers Substantial Subsidy for Black & Veatch Development

City officials in Overland Park are evaluating a proposal for nearly $230 million in public subsidies for a significant real estate project led by Black & Veatch, a well-known engineering firm based in the area. This substantial financial request stems from the firm’s ambitions to transform its 78-acre campus into a vast mixed-use development.

The proposed project, dubbed Overland Park Plaza II, carries an estimated total cost of $1.12 billion. It aims to create a new headquarters for Black & Veatch, alongside 1,900 residential units, a hotel, and various retail spaces. Additionally, plans also feature a public park and around 6,000 parking spots to support the anticipated influx of residents and visitors.

Black & Veatch is requesting $227.7 million in tax increment financing (TIF), in combination with $19.9 million from a special sales tax district and exemptions from construction sales taxes. These incentives are intended to cover roughly 22% of the overall project cost. While the TIF program is typically reserved for properties designated as “conservation areas” under Kansas law, which often includes deteriorating properties, the current site is not dilapidated but rather undergoing a repositioning that is a standard practice in the private sector.

This situation mirrors past events in Overland Park where private developers have sought public assistance to upgrade their properties. The request has drawn criticism, as many view these subsidies as ineffective in delivering economic benefits, sometimes leading to job relocations rather than actual growth.

The proposal puts Black & Veatch in a unique position as the firm expands into sectors like residential, hospitality, and commercial real estate. This expansion occurs in areas where other private developers operate without the benefit of public funding, raising concerns about possible market distortion. Competing developers are obliged to manage all their costs, while Black & Veatch could operate under significant financial advantages presented by the proposed subsidies.

Transparency also looms as an issue, with city leaders now tasked with determining whether taxpayer money should be allocated to support what appears to be a private investment. The first public hearing concerning this development project is slated for July 7 at Overland Park City Hall, providing an opportunity for residents to either attend in person or tune in online.

Previous audits conducted by the Kansas Legislature have shown that economic development subsidies often fail to meet expected outcomes. Furthermore, they can place a strain on critical public services, such as education and infrastructure, as resources are diverted.

As Overland Park officials deliberate on this highly substantial proposal, they face a crucial decision regarding the future of local public funding and its impact on the community. Will they prioritize equitable governance that benefits the broader population, or will they facilitate the growth of a single company using taxpayer resources? The outcome of these discussions could set a significant precedent for future development projects and the role of public financing in real estate ventures.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

Additional Resources

Article Sponsored by:

CMiC Global

CMIC Global Logo

Since 1974, CMiC has been a global leader in enterprise software for the construction industry. Headquartered in Toronto, Canada, CMiC delivers a fully integrated platform that streamlines project management, financials, and field operations.

With a focus on innovation and customer success, CMiC empowers construction firms to enhance efficiency, improve collaboration, and make data-driven decisions. Trusted by industry leaders worldwide, CMiC continues to shape the future of construction technology.

Read More About CMiC: 

Stay Connected

More Updates

Would You Like To Add Your Business?

WordPress Ads